👉 👉 Part 1 — Introduction – Karna
An Ethical, Psychological, and Civilizational Reading of the Mahabharata
👉 The Most Powerful Archer Who Never Belonged
🌟 There are warriors who lose battles.
🌟 And there are warriors who lose belonging.
🌟 Karna lost both—but not because he lacked strength.📑 Table of Contents
- 👉 👉 Part 1 — Introduction – Karna
- An Ethical, Psychological, and Civilizational Reading of the Mahabharata
- 👉 The Most Powerful Archer Who Never Belonged
- 👉 Karna Did Not Fail Because He Lacked Ability
- 👉 The Illusion of Merit in a World Governed by Power
- 👉 Questions That Refuse to Stay in the Past
- 👉 👉 Part 2 — Abandoned Before He Could Choose
- 👉 The Trauma of Being Unclaimed
- 👉 Kunti’s Fear and the First Moral Collapse
- 👉 The River as the First Witness of Injustice
- 👉 Psychological Insight: Abandonment Before Identity
- 👉 Karna’s Battle Began in Infancy
- 👉 👉 Part 3 — Talent Without Lineage
- 👉 When Skill Meets Social Walls
- 👉 The Martial Arena: Where Merit Was Visible but Unacceptable
- 👉 The Silent Violence of Social Gatekeeping
- 👉 Talent Without Recognition Becomes Resentment
- 👉 👉 Part 4 — Duryodhana: The Shelter That Came At A Price
- Deep Ethical & Civilizational Analysis
- 👉 Protection Without Dharma
- 👉 The Coronation: Belonging at Last
- 👉 Gratitude as the Foundation of Loyalty
- 👉 Moral Complexity: Shelter Given by the Adharmic
- 👉 Protection Without Correction
- 👉 👉 Part 5 — Curses, Silence, And Isolation
- 👉 Why Karna Had No One to Intervene
- 👉 Parashurama’s Curse: Knowledge Without Guardianship
- 👉 The Earth Swallowing the Chariot Wheel
- 👉 Core Insight: Teachers Without Protectors
- 👉 Contrast with Arjuna: Community vs Isolation
- 👉 👉 Part 6 — Karna And The Myth Of Meritocracy
- 👉 Why Skill Alone Never Wins
- 👉 The Illusion of Neutral Systems
- 👉 Hidden Talent and Marginalized Brilliance
- 👉 Dharma Is Not Neutral
- 👉 Merit Without Support Is Exploitation in Disguise
- 👉 👉 Part 7 — Karna Vs Arjuna
- The Final Ethical Arc of the Mahabharata’s Most Modern Tragedy
- 👉 Talent Without Shelter vs Talent With Alignment
- 👉 Skill: Equal, Yet Unequally Valued
- 👉 Ethics: Divergent Not by Nature, but by Environment
- 👉 Support Systems: Unequal by Design
- 👉 Destiny: Shaped, Not Chosen
- 👉 The War Was Not Won by Skill
- 👉 “What kind of heroes are we creating today?”
- 👉 👉 Part 8 — What Karna Teaches Modern Leaders & Societies
- 👉 Protect Talent or Be Destroyed by It
- 👉 Organizations: Talent Is Not a Resource, It Is a Responsibility
- 👉 Governments: Exclusion Creates Counterforces
- 👉 Families: The First Institution of Shelter
- 👉 Institutions: Neutrality Is Not Ethical
- 👉 Key Principle: Ethical Shelter Over Transactional Use
- 👉 Reflection: Volatility vs Civilizational Capital
- 👉 “We can build systems where no Karna is forced into darkness.”
- 👉 👉 Part 9 — Conclusion
- 👉 People, Planet, Profit — and the Cost of Ignoring Karna
- 👉 People: Dignity Before Performance
- 👉 Planet: Exploitation Is a Shared Pattern
- 👉 Profit: Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Loss
- 👉 The Final Truth
- 📌 Related Posts
The Mahabharata introduces Karna not as a villain, nor as a hero in the conventional sense, but as a cosmic contradiction—a man whose brilliance burned brighter than his shelter, whose gifts outpaced the systems meant to recognize them.
He stood equal to Arjuna, sometimes even superior in raw martial force.
He was born of divine radiance, the son of Surya himself.
He carried within him the armor and earrings of invincibility—symbols of cosmic favor.
Yet he was raised without lineage, without name, without social legitimacy.
He was respected for skill, whispered about for power—
and denied for birth, publicly humiliated for origins he never chose.
This is not merely Karna’s story.
This is a story about how civilizations treat talent that arrives unprotected.
👉 Karna Did Not Fail Because He Lacked Ability
This is perhaps the most uncomfortable truth hidden inside the Mahabharata.
Karna did not fail because he was less capable.
He failed because no ethical, social, or institutional system stood behind him.
Skill, in isolation, is fragile.
Talent, when unsupported, becomes vulnerable.
Merit, without legitimacy, becomes dangerous—to the individual and to society.
The epic forces us to confront a disturbing possibility:
🌟 What if Karna was not defeated by Arjuna—
but by abandonment, silence, and structural neglect?
👉 The Illusion of Merit in a World Governed by Power
The Mahabharata is often presented as a battle between good and evil, dharma and adharma, Pandavas and Kauravas. But beneath this moral architecture lies a more uncomfortable layer:
Merit alone never decides destiny. Power does. Protection does. Alignment does.
Karna’s life exposes a truth modern societies still struggle to accept:
👉 Talent does not survive on excellence alone.
👉 It survives on shelter.
Without mentorship, without legitimacy, without protection from humiliation and exploitation, talent does not rise—it hardens.
👉 Questions That Refuse to Stay in the Past
Karna’s story presses three questions that remain painfully contemporary:
🌟 Why does talent need protection to survive?
🌟 Is merit ever enough in a world structured by hierarchy and power?
🌟 When gifted individuals fall, who is ethically responsible—the individual or the system?
These are not mythological questions.
They are institutional questions.
They are psychological questions.
They are ethical questions.
And the Mahabharata, in its brutal honesty, does not offer comforting answers.
👉 “Everything we know about merit in the Mahabharata may be incomplete.”
Because the epic does not celebrate merit blindly.
It exposes how unprotected merit is often sacrificed—
used, exploited, and ultimately discarded.
Karna is not a failure of effort.
He is a failure of civilization.
👉 👉 Part 2 — Abandoned Before He Could Choose
👉 The Trauma of Being Unclaimed
🌟 Before Karna was rejected by society,
🌟 he was rejected by destiny’s first gatekeeper.
His tragedy did not begin in the battlefield,
nor in the martial arena,
nor in rivalry with Arjuna.
It began in silence.
👉 Kunti’s Fear and the First Moral Collapse
Karna’s abandonment is often narrated briefly—almost casually—as if it were a tragic footnote. But ethically, it is one of the most consequential acts in the epic.
Kunti, young and unwed, invokes a divine boon.
Surya appears.
A child of light is conceived.
And then comes fear.
Fear of society.
Fear of shame.
Fear of judgment.
Not fear for the child’s destiny—but fear for her own survival.
🌟 And so, before Karna could breathe identity,
🌟 before he could form memory,
🌟 before consciousness itself—
He was placed in a basket.
And sent down a river.
👉 The River as the First Witness of Injustice
The river does not judge.
It carries.
But society judges.
And abandons.
This act is not merely maternal failure.
It is structural cowardice.
Kunti’s silence becomes Karna’s inheritance.
👉 Psychological Insight: Abandonment Before Identity
Modern psychology recognizes what the Mahabharata intuited thousands of years ago:
🌟 Trauma before memory still shapes destiny.
Abandonment at infancy fractures identity before it forms.
The psyche internalizes three unspoken messages:
👉 I was not chosen.
👉 My existence is a burden.
👉 I must earn belonging through performance.
Karna grows not with entitlement—but with hunger.
Not arrogance—but overcompensation.
Not entitlement to grace—but obsession with recognition.
👉 Karna’s Battle Began in Infancy
Karna’s battle did not begin at Kurukshetra.
It began in a basket—adrift, unnamed, unclaimed.
This is why Karna’s life feels perpetually defensive.
Why his loyalty is intense.
Why his pride is sharp-edged.
Why his gratitude becomes absolute.
Because when belonging is denied at birth,
attachment becomes survival.
👉 “Who bears responsibility for a life denied its truth?”
Is it the mother who feared society?
Is it the society that punished motherhood?
Is it the system that made truth unaffordable?
The Mahabharata does not absolve easily.
It reminds us that silence, too, is an ethical act—
and its consequences echo across lifetimes.
👉 👉 Part 3 — Talent Without Lineage
👉 When Skill Meets Social Walls
🌟 Karna did everything right—except be born correctly.
This is the cruel irony at the heart of his life.
👉 The Martial Arena: Where Merit Was Visible but Unacceptable
The scene is iconic.
A public martial arena.
Princes assembled.
Skills on display.
Arjuna performs.
The court applauds.
Then Karna steps forward.
🔗 Read More from This Category
His archery is flawless.
His confidence unshaken.
His challenge direct.
And yet—
The question asked is not about skill.
Not about training.
Not about discipline.
🌟 “Who is your father?”
In that moment, the Mahabharata exposes a brutal truth:
Merit is not evaluated in isolation.
It is filtered through legitimacy.
👉 Critical Reflection: Opportunity Is Conditional
Karna’s skill was undeniable.
But opportunity was not merit-based.
It was permission-based.
🌟 Legitimacy required lineage.
🌟 Recognition required pedigree.
🌟 Entry required approval.
Talent alone was insufficient.
👉 The Silent Violence of Social Gatekeeping
This was not physical violence.
It was existential invalidation.
A message delivered without weapons:
👉 You may be gifted.
👉 But you are not authorized.
And when authorization replaces evaluation,
society does not select the best—
it selects the familiar.
👉 Talent Without Recognition Becomes Resentment
This is not Karna’s moral failure.
It is a predictable psychological outcome.
When brilliance is repeatedly denied legitimacy:
🌟 Confidence curdles into bitterness.
🌟 Gratitude turns into transactional loyalty.
🌟 Ethics bend toward survival.
Resentment is not born from arrogance.
It is born from chronic invalidation.
👉 “The silent crisis of gifted lives denied entry.”
Karna becomes the embodiment of a question civilizations avoid:
🌟 What happens when the gifted are excluded not for lack of merit—but for lack of acceptance?
The Mahabharata does not answer softly.
It answers with war.
👉 👉 Part 4 — Duryodhana: The Shelter That Came At A Price
Deep Ethical & Civilizational Analysis
👉 Protection Without Dharma
🌟 When society denies shelter to talent, talent does not disappear.
🌟 It simply accepts shelter from elsewhere.
This is where Karna’s life takes its most decisive—and most tragic—turn.
Until this moment, Karna is unrecognized brilliance, wandering at the margins of legitimacy. His suffering is passive: exclusion, humiliation, silence. But after this moment, his suffering becomes active—entangled with power, loyalty, and ethical compromise.
👉 The Coronation: Belonging at Last
Duryodhana does something no one else dares to do.
In the public arena, after Karna is humiliated for his birth, Duryodhana steps forward—not to question his skill, but to override the system that denied him entry.
He crowns Karna King of Anga.
This moment is often romanticized as generosity.
But ethically, it is far more complex.
🌟 For Karna, this is not merely political elevation.
🌟 It is the first moment of belonging in his life.
He is no longer the abandoned child.
No longer the questioned warrior.
No longer the man without lineage.
He is seen.
And for someone whose entire life has been shaped by rejection, this visibility becomes sacred.
👉 Gratitude as the Foundation of Loyalty
Karna’s loyalty to Duryodhana is frequently judged as moral blindness. But such judgment ignores a deeper psychological truth:
🌟 Gratitude formed in deprivation is not voluntary—it is binding.
Karna does not pledge loyalty after ethical evaluation.
He pledges loyalty because Duryodhana gives him shelter when no one else will.
This is not loyalty born of shared values.
It is loyalty born of survival.
🌟 When dignity is denied repeatedly, even flawed acceptance feels like salvation.
👉 Moral Complexity: Shelter Given by the Adharmic
Here lies the Mahabharata’s sharpest ethical indictment—not of Karna, but of the system.
Duryodhana is not righteous.
He is not dharmic.
He is not corrective.
But he is present.
And that presence matters.
🌟 When the righteous abandon talent, the unrighteous adopt it.
This is not a moral defense of Duryodhana.
It is a systemic warning.
When ethical systems fail to nurture brilliance, unethical systems exploit it.
👉 Protection Without Correction
Duryodhana protects Karna—but he never corrects him.
He offers status without guidance.
Power without restraint.
Belonging without ethical anchoring.
🌟 This is transactional shelter, not moral shelter.
Karna is not challenged when he errs.
He is not guided when he hardens.
He is not restrained when loyalty conflicts with justice.
Duryodhana does not ask Karna to be righteous.
He only asks him to be useful.
👉 The Ethical Cost of Conditional Shelter
This is where Karna’s tragedy deepens.
Shelter, when offered by adharmic hands, always carries a price:
👉 Silence when injustice occurs
👉 Participation when power demands
👉 Loyalty over conscience
Karna accepts this price—not because he is evil, but because he has never known unconditional protection.
🏷️ You Might Also Like (Similar Tags)
- Chirpy’s Lesson on Dharma and Karma: A Story of Fulfilling One’s Duty
- The Squirrel’s Lesson on Dharma and Karma: The Cycle of Giving and Receiving
- Dharma & Decision-Making for Modern Leaders
- The Tale of Mango Tree and Lemon Tree: A Lesson in Humility and Cooperation
- The Weight of Words – Every Word Is a Seed
🌟 For Karna, loyalty becomes the substitute for legitimacy.
🌟 Gratitude becomes the substitute for dharma.
👉 “Who benefits when talent is forced to choose the wrong shelter?”
The answer is unsettling.
Unethical power structures thrive when the gifted feel abandoned elsewhere.
They gain competence without conscience.
Strength without restraint.
And societies that fail to protect talent ethically eventually face talent turned against them.
👉 👉 Part 5 — Curses, Silence, And Isolation
👉 Why Karna Had No One to Intervene
🌟 Teachers impart knowledge.
🌟 Protectors intervene when fate turns hostile.
Karna had the former.
He never had the latter.
👉 Parashurama’s Curse: Knowledge Without Guardianship
Parashurama trains Karna in advanced martial knowledge—but under a false identity.
This itself reveals a tragic pattern:
🌟 Karna must hide who he is even to learn.
When the truth emerges, Parashurama curses him—not out of cruelty, but out of betrayal.
The curse ensures that Karna will forget crucial knowledge at the moment he needs it most.
This is not merely divine punishment.
It is structural vulnerability.
Karna learns, but no one safeguards the conditions under which that learning can save him.
👉 The Earth Swallowing the Chariot Wheel
On the battlefield, when Karna’s chariot wheel sinks into the earth, fate tightens its grip.
He struggles alone.
There is no divine pause.
No cosmic intervention.
No voice reminding the rules of war.
🌟 The earth itself turns against him.
This moment symbolizes more than destiny—it symbolizes isolation.
👉 Core Insight: Teachers Without Protectors
Karna had teachers.
He never had protectors.
This single line explains everything.
Teachers teach skills.
Protectors ensure survival.
Karna’s life is rich in instruction but poor in intervention.
👉 Contrast with Arjuna: Community vs Isolation
Arjuna is not more skilled than Karna.
But he is never alone.
🌟 Krishna guides him.
🌟 Indra intervenes for him.
🌟 His brothers stand with him.
Arjuna’s failures are buffered by community.
Karna’s failures are absorbed by silence.
This is not favoritism.
It is structural alignment.
Dharma surrounds Arjuna.
Karna stands outside its shelter.
👉 “What if Karna’s tragedy was structural, not personal?”
This question dismantles centuries of moral simplification.
Karna is not cursed because he is flawed.
He is vulnerable because no system intervenes on his behalf.
👉 👉 Part 6 — Karna And The Myth Of Meritocracy
👉 Why Skill Alone Never Wins
🌟 Meritocracy promises fairness.
🌟 But history rewards alignment.
The Mahabharata exposes the myth that skill alone determines destiny.
👉 The Illusion of Neutral Systems
Meritocracy assumes neutral evaluation.
But no system is neutral.
Every structure rewards certain behaviors, lineages, and loyalties.
Karna’s excellence threatens the system—
because it arrives uninvited.
👉 Hidden Talent and Marginalized Brilliance
Across civilizations, talent often emerges from the margins.
But without sponsorship, such brilliance is either:
👉 Ignored
👉 Exploited
👉 Redirected toward destructive ends
Karna’s life follows this pattern precisely.
👉 Dharma Is Not Neutral
This is the epic’s most radical lesson.
🌟 Dharma requires guardians.
Without guardians, dharma collapses into ritual.
Without intervention, justice becomes performative.
👉 Merit Without Support Is Exploitation in Disguise
Merit without support is exploitation in disguise.
Karna’s labor, loyalty, and brilliance are consumed by a system that never fully commits to his ethical flourishing.
👉 “If we don’t fix this, talent will keep bleeding into resentment.”
The Mahabharata is not warning us about Karna.
It is warning us about ourselves.
👉 👉 Part 7 — Karna Vs Arjuna
The Final Ethical Arc of the Mahabharata’s Most Modern Tragedy
👉 Talent Without Shelter vs Talent With Alignment
🌟 History often remembers winners as superior.
🌟 Epics remind us that winners are often better protected.
The rivalry between Karna and Arjuna has been narrated for centuries as a contest of skill. But that interpretation is shallow. The Mahabharata never intended this duel to be read as talent versus talent.
It is alignment versus isolation.
It is sheltered brilliance versus exposed brilliance.
It is ethics embedded in systems versus ethics left to the individual.
👉 Skill: Equal, Yet Unequally Valued
On the axis of pure ability, Karna and Arjuna stand remarkably close.
Both mastered divine weapons.
Both trained under legendary teachers.
Both demonstrated composure, courage, and technical excellence under pressure.
In several traditions, Karna is described as slightly superior in raw martial force. What differentiates them is not competence—but context.
🌟 Skill does not operate in a vacuum.
🌟 It operates inside systems.
And systems choose sides.
👉 Ethics: Divergent Not by Nature, but by Environment
It is easy to frame Arjuna as ethical and Karna as compromised. But this comparison becomes dishonest when it ignores how ethics are cultivated.
Arjuna grows inside a moral ecosystem:
- Constant dialogue with Krishna
- Corrective guidance at moments of doubt
- Ethical recalibration even after transgressions
Karna grows inside silence:
- Loyalty demanded but conscience ignored
- Gratitude weaponized
- No ethical mentor empowered to challenge his choices
🌟 Ethics are not innate ornaments.
🌟 They are reinforced behaviors.
🌐 Explore More from AdikkaChannels
- In the Stillness of Waiting: Unveiling the Profound Wisdom of Patience in Sanatana Dharma
- Hydroponics: From Pilot to Profit
- Conscious Deliberation: Reclaiming People, Planet, and Profit from the Manipulation of First Impressions
- Unlocking Free Will: How Neuroscience and Vedic Philosophy Align in the Art of Decision-Making
- Why ‘Thinking’ Alone Fails and ‘No Thinking’ Leads to True Solutions: A Modern and Sanatana Dharma Perspective
- Unmasking the Inner Devil: Harnessing the Subconscious Mind in Sanatana Dharma
- Sanatana Dharma and Secularism: A Journey Through Ancient Philosophy, Inclusivity, and Modern Relevance
- The Hidden Power of Hunger: How Controlling What You Eat and Drink Can Break Your Weaknesses and Bring Self-Mastery
- Wolf Behavior in Sanatana Dharma: Debunking Myths and Understanding True Ethical Principles
- Ethical Principles of Wealth Management in Sanatana Dharma
- Beyond the Vedas: Exploring the Secrets of Shiva’s Pre-Vedic Existence
- Ahimsa Paramo Dharma: Navigating the Sacred Balance of Non-Violence and Duty in Sanatana Dharma
- Introduction to Maa Durga: History, Significance and Symbolism
- Knowledge Management: Saraswati’s Role in Organizational Learning
Arjuna’s ethics are nurtured.
Karna’s ethics are tested without support.
👉 Support Systems: Unequal by Design
This is the most decisive axis.
Arjuna is never alone.
When he hesitates, Krishna speaks.
When he errs, guidance intervenes.
When he faces cosmic dilemmas, the universe pauses.
Karna is always alone.
When he is humiliated, silence responds.
When he is cursed, no appeal arises.
When his chariot sinks, the earth offers no mercy.
🌟 The Mahabharata does not reward courage alone.
🌟 It rewards courage backed by community.
Support systems are not favoritism.
They are ethical infrastructure.
👉 Destiny: Shaped, Not Chosen
One of the epic’s most uncomfortable truths is this:
👉 Destiny is not freely chosen.
👉 It is shaped by access to alignment.
Arjuna’s destiny bends because dharma bends with him.
Karna’s destiny hardens because dharma stands distant.
🌟 Karna does not lack free will.
🌟 He lacks corrective companionship.
👉 The War Was Not Won by Skill
The Mahabharata was not won by skill.
It was won by alignment.
Alignment with:
- Dharma
- Community
- Ethical correction
- Cosmic timing
Skill merely executes what alignment enables.
👉 “What kind of heroes are we creating today?”
Are we creating:
- Skilled individuals abandoned to navigate ethics alone?
- Or capable individuals supported by moral ecosystems?
Because the next Karna or Arjuna is not born in mythology.
They are being shaped right now—by our systems.
👉 👉 Part 8 — What Karna Teaches Modern Leaders & Societies
👉 Protect Talent or Be Destroyed by It
🌟 Civilizations do not collapse due to lack of talent.
🌟 They collapse due to mishandled talent.
Karna’s life is not merely a tragedy—it is a warning manual for leaders, institutions, and societies.
👉 Organizations: Talent Is Not a Resource, It Is a Responsibility
Modern organizations often pride themselves on “merit-based selection.” But Karna’s story reveals a hidden flaw:
🌟 Selection without protection breeds volatility.
When organizations extract performance without offering dignity:
- Talent disengages
- Loyalty turns transactional
- Innovation mutates into rebellion
Karna’s loyalty to Duryodhana mirrors what happens when talent finds shelter in flawed leadership—competence strengthens unethical power.
👉 Governments: Exclusion Creates Counterforces
When governance systems fail to integrate marginalized brilliance:
- Parallel power structures emerge
- Resentment accumulates
- Stability erodes from within
Karna is not an enemy created by malice—
he is a counterforce created by neglect.
👉 Families: The First Institution of Shelter
Karna’s abandonment reminds us that families are not just biological units—they are ethical incubators.
When identity is denied at the foundational level:
- Self-worth becomes performance-dependent
- Belonging becomes conditional
- Loyalty replaces discernment
Families that shelter talent with dignity create citizens.
Families that abandon it create survivors.
👉 Institutions: Neutrality Is Not Ethical
Institutions often claim neutrality.
But Karna teaches us that neutrality favors the already protected.
🌟 Dharma is not passive.
🌟 It must actively shelter.
👉 Key Principle: Ethical Shelter Over Transactional Use
Talent needs ethical shelter, not transactional use.
Transactional systems say:
- “Deliver results, and you belong.”
Ethical systems say:
- “You belong, therefore you can deliver.”
The difference defines civilizations.
👉 Reflection: Volatility vs Civilizational Capital
🌟 Abandoned talent becomes volatile.
🌟 Supported talent becomes civilizational capital.
Karna’s rage is not personal failure—it is stored injustice.
👉 “We can build systems where no Karna is forced into darkness.”
This is not idealism.
It is survival wisdom.
👉 👉 Part 9 — Conclusion
👉 People, Planet, Profit — and the Cost of Ignoring Karna
🌟 Epics end not with answers—but with accountability.
Karna’s tragedy does not belong to the Mahabharata alone.
It belongs to every system that confuses merit with morality, and performance with worth.
👉 People: Dignity Before Performance
Human dignity must precede output.
When people are valued only for what they produce:
- Burnout replaces devotion
- Loyalty becomes fear-based
- Ethics erode quietly
Protection is not charity.
It is ethical responsibility.
👉 Planet: Exploitation Is a Shared Pattern
The same mindset that exploits unprotected talent exploits nature.
🌟 Systems that exhaust people eventually exhaust the earth.
Sustainability requires:
- Inclusion
- Long-term thinking
- Ethical restraint
Karna’s life mirrors extractive logic:
Take strength.
Ignore shelter.
Face collapse.
👉 Profit: Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Loss
Systems that harvest brilliance without nurturing it may succeed briefly.
But they always fail eventually.
🌟 Ethical shelter creates:
- Loyalty with conscience
- Innovation with responsibility
- Profit with continuity
👉 The Final Truth
Karna did not lose because he was weak.
He lost because no one stood beside him
when strength needed shelter.
The Mahabharata leaves us with a choice.
We can continue building systems that admire talent from afar—
or we can build systems that stand beside it.
Because the next Karna is already among us.
And history is watching what we choose to do.

